|
|
| [MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
| [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Mar 30, 1995 08:32 AM
by Nicholas Weeks
With a chronological ML and a *non*chronological ML it was bound to happen. For the future I will try to remember to use, when citing only the ML letter number: ML = 2nd or 3rd edition MLC = Vic Hao Chin's new chronological arrangement. So MLC 31 is what should have been written, or ML 40, as Jerry S. points out Nicholas