Re: theos-l digest: January 30, 1999
Jan 30, 1999 09:54 PM
by kymsmith
Dallas wrote:
>Again, why should the intermixing of the gametes invoke a
>"soul/mind" to use a potential "body/form" which will not have
>any future as a living human ?
That's a good question - but the same question can be applied to the
circumstance of an infant dying after only a few days or months. Is the
experience of being an infant for a few days "worth" an entry of a
"soul/mind?" I'm not sure if I want to declare that immediately born
infants do not possess a "soul/mind" although I do know there are those who
believe the "soul" enters even a few days later. Could be true, I don't
know. But if a "soul/mind" did enter a "being" that had no future in
'humandom,' would that really still constitute a "waste of time?" Is there
nothing to learn or experience even in the gamete stage? Maybe, but what
is to be learned and experienced as a day-old infant only to die that very
night?
It would seem to me that EVERY circumstance a "soul/mind" may find itself
in could potentially be a worthwhile experience - from rock to bug to
gamete to human to whatever. But if someone asked "Kym, are you willing to
eat dirt to stand by that statement?" Hmmm, I guess my answer would depend
on how many people were watching.
Kym
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application