Theos-Talk Archives (May 1996 Message tl01281)

> From: m.k. ramadoss <ramadoss@eden.com>
> Subject: Re: why reduction in numbers

It is feedback like yours that should help to make the theos-xxx better
and more useful for more subscribers. As I think your feedback is
valuable, I am cross posting this to theos-l.

Cheers

	....Ramadoss


On Thu, 23 May 1996, Joanne Greig wrote:

> I feel the same as Anne, though I'm still getting theos-roots, which also picks
> up a few cross-posts from the other theos lists.  However I often
> delete messages without reading them, especially those of a political character
> or the "one-liners".  This stuff was really pouring in at one stage, but
> unfortunately to my mind there was little of value in it. I find the esoteric
> astrology list I subscribe to more interesting in terms of discussing
> principles,
>  putting them into practice, and also openness to others' ideas, and I feel more
>  inclined to send messages when I get time.  I wasn't going to say anything as I
>  don't like to be too negative and have a "live and let live" attitude, but
> since
>  someone asked...
>
> ASTREA
>
> At 09:13 23/05/96 -0400, you wrote:
> >
> >DHC:
> >>Is this a seasonal variation?  Theos-l has lost 16 subscribers in the last 5
> >>months.
> >
> >I left earlier this year for the following reasons:
> >1. Sheer volume of daily messages.
> >2. Lack of interest in subject matter.
> >3.  Didn't feel I was learning anything.
> >
> >While I feel it's important to have a mailing list that is independent and not
> >censured, it is even more important that the list doesn't lapse into bickering
> >and jokes.  B&J are always good for spice, but who wants to eat spice cake all
> >day?
> >
> >- Ann E. Bermingham
> >
> >
> >
>
>