Theos-Talk Archives (March 1995 Message tl00229)

Jerry Schueler <76400.1474@compuserve.com> writes:

> Roots and hash this out between them.  We have all heard a lot
> about where Paul was wrong, but nothing about what really did
> happen or who the real Masters were (which no one knows with
> certainty, but at least Paul J took a reasonable stab at it).

I haven't seen Paul J.'s book, so cannot comment on it, but
offered the Hodson material as a more subjective approach to the
continued reality of the Masters and their inspiration of the
T.S.

I feel it _is_ valuable to debate who they were, but more
importantly, _what_ they are, and the implications this has for
us today.  The masters themselves suggest that they should not be
considered as personalities, but rather as the Principle behind.