Re: carnivorism question
Oct 21, 1999 06:07 AM
by WLR7D
--part1_0.be490307.25406a11_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dallas please see attached re your response to carnivorism and sex.
--part1_0.be490307.25406a11_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; name="SEX2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="SEX2"
<HTML><PRE>Thank you Dallas
>You have lost me that "cooperation and brotherhood provide our bodies". Ho=
w would you prove such a statement?
>What does ethics have to do with sex? Whose ethic? What kind of sex?
>Sex is both serious and fun. So is eating, hearing, smelling and seeing. =
Who is going to decide what fun there is about any of these physical senses =
we should eliminate?
>I'm not sure what you mean by physiological and disease transmission. If y=
ou are suggesting that disease attendent with sex proves it should be avoide=
d that is not valid since disease is also associated with eating, breathing,=
touching, exercise, hard work(stress), and wearing chastity belts too tigh=
t(or underwear). Which of these should we abstain from too?
I have not read the reference yet, but I will when I can find it. Neverthel=
ess I am going to ask the same sorts of questions because I am interested in=
the logical or empirical underpinnings.
Randy</PRE></HTML>
--part1_0.be490307.25406a11_boundary--
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
