Theos-Talk Archives (November 1996 Message tl00550)

In message <961129193452_1084768775@emout05.mail.aol.com>, RIhle@aol.com
writes
>Alan Bain writes-->
>
><< Dear Richard,
>
> You *could* subscribe to the TI statement of intent without thereby
> abandoning your integrity to the spirit of the three objects as
> currently formulated.  The Societies are not likely to change them
> anyway- even though they do *not* constitute an inviolable document.  So
> far as TS (Adyar) is concerned the objects as written need to remain as
> stated if for no other reason than that they are part of the Articles of
> Incorporation ("TS Rules Adyar" on web page - in HISTORY directory I
> think) and form part of the legal structure of that body.
>
> Alan >>
>
>Richard Ihle writes-->
>Alan, jump in on my side against Kym and I'll join. . . .
>
Huh?  What a strange suggestion. It has nothing to do with the point I
am trying to make above.  I cannot have failed to notice that you are
having a discussion/debate with Kym, but it has seemed to be reasonably
civilised to me - but now you are talking of "taking sides."  If you
really mean this, then I suspect she has more right on hers, and that
suggestions of "attitude" on your part might have some foundation in
fact.

Sigh.

Alan
---------
THEOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL: Ancient Wisdom for a New Age:
http://www.nellie2.demon.co.uk/
E-mail: TINT@nellie2.demon.co.uk