Theos-Talk Archives (November 1996 Message tl00051)

On Sat, 2 Nov 1996, Dr. A.M.Bain wrote:

> In message <Pine.BSD/.3.91.961102073218.504C-100000@matrix.eden.com>,
> "m.k. ramadoss" <ramadoss@eden.com> writes
> >       The production of the letters has been discussed rather
> >extensively and all the evidence points out to  the authenticity of the
> >letters.
>
> Errr ... how about:
>
> The production of the letters has been discussed rather
> extensively and much of the evidence points out to the non-authenticity
> of the letters.  Many who have studied them suspect the direct hand of
> HPB in the production of certainly some of them.
>
> If you are going to make sweeping generalisations like "all the evidence
> points to, etc." then you had better produce "all the evidence" and then
> follow it up with a seriously reasoned case for the authenticity of the
> letters being a fact.
>
> Alan


The issue has been fully addressed in:

	The Mahatmas and Their Letters by Geoffrey A Barborka
        ISBN 0-8356-7062-7

MKRamadoss