|[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]|
|[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]|
Oct 09, 1996 04:49 PM
by Dr. A.M.Bain
In message <Pine.OSF.3.90.961009095418.7290M- email@example.com>, Maxim Osinovsky <firstname.lastname@example.org .edu> writes >Could we please discuss the Ageless Wisdom >rather than perspectives on it? I think this is very difficult. You mention the Master D.K. whose existence and communications are meaningful to members of the Arcane School and the followrs of Alice Bailey. Many theosophists argue that this material is unreliable, and will not include it as part of the ageless wisdom. In other words, before we can even *hope* to discuss the Ageless Wisdom, we have to try to agree about what constitutes it. Much discussion on this list has been about this controversial subject. Alan --------- Homepage: http://www.nellie2.demon.co.uk/ THEOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL: Ancient Wisdom for a New Age: TI@nellie2.demon.co.uk, and from homepage above.