[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
May 04, 1996 02:06 PM
by Richtay
Keith wrote, > I think this freedom of speech is all > right as long as you agree with me and if not I'll call you a name attitude, is > worse than calling one a name, I think(?), or none of this namecalling is very > buddhic. Well homophobe is a name too and doesn't lilt off the tounge either:) > Yes, it is cruel to categorize one and inspire prejudice and perpertrate unfair > stereotypes. But sometimes you have got to use the word that fits-my first > thought was fruitcake and almost everyone has confirmed I was right! So hang me! > Because one is homosexual would not make one any less or more of a spiritual > being (this is a topic in itself) from this fact alone. But one has a right to > freedom of expression of impressions and feelings, just as one has a right to > freedom of sexual expression. You can use anger and intolerance to fight anger > and intolerance, but it doesn't change anyone, at least not on a deep level. > You can only silence all free expressions of viewpoints! > > Your mother wears army boots, > Keith Price > Sticks and stones may break my bones, but Namaste anyway! Now that is the FUNNIEST response I have read in a while. Welcome to Theos-hell, Keith, where ANYTHING can and will be used against you in a court of law. And my law is ALWAYS holier-than-thou.