Theos-Talk Archives (April 1996 Message tl00050)

At 01:30 PM 4/8/96 -0500, you wrote:
>In message <960407235155_371131359@emout10.mail.aol.com>,
>Drpsionic@aol.com writes
>> Are we implying that members of other theosophical organizations are not
>>free and if we personally believe that, do we want to make that point as a
>>part of TI?
>>
>>Chuck the Barbarian, MTI, FTSA
>>Heretic
>>Troublemaker
>
>Do we not exist in the first place (as TI) *because* of a lack of
>genuine freedom (as we have perceived and experienced it) in one or more
>theosophical organisations?  And are we not determined that such
>restrictions as we have experienced/observed shall not be allowed to
>interfere in our own percpetion of the theosophical way of life?

Alan: I wish it wasn't so, but what you say is absolutely true. The trouble
is, many of the people subscribing to this list do not feel free topursue
their own personal theosophy.
>
>Yes, I for one *do* want to make it a point of TI, just as the USA seeks
>to declare itself the Land of the Free (debatable, too).
>
>Alan.
>---------
>THEOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL:
>Ancient Wisdom for a New Age
>TI@nellie2.demon.co.uk
>
Unfortunately America's notion of itself as either the "only" free nation or
"the most fee nation" is pathology.

alexis>