Plotinus 4
Mar 10, 1996 07:33 PM
by Nicholas Weeks
The Six Enneads
BY PLOTINUS
Written 250 A.D.
Translated By Stephen Mackenna And B. S. Page
_________________________________________________________________
THE FOURTH ENNEAD - SECOND TRACTATE [extracts]
ON THE ESSENCE OF THE SOUL (2).
[...]
There are, we hold, things primarily apt to partition, tending by
sheer nature towards separate existence: they are things in which no
part is identical either with another part or with the whole, while,
also their part is necessarily less than the total and whole: these
are magnitudes of the realm of sense, masses, each of which has a
station of its own so that none can be identically present in
entirety at more than one point at one time.
But to that order is opposed Essence [Real-Being]; this is in no
degree susceptible of partition; it is unparted and impartible;
interval is foreign to it, cannot enter into our idea of it: it has
no need of place and is not, in diffusion or as an entirety,
situated within any other being: it is poised over all beings at
once, and this is not in the sense of using them as a base but in
their being neither capable nor desirous of existing independently
of it; it is an essence eternally unvaried: it is common to all that
follows upon it: it is like the circle's centre to which all the
radii are attached while leaving it unbrokenly in possession of
itself, the starting point of their course and of their essential
being, the ground in which they all participate: thus the
indivisible is the principle of these divided existences and in
their very outgoing they remain enduringly in contact with that
stationary essence.
[...]
The Essence, very near to the impartible, which we assert to belong
to the Kind we are now dealing with, is at once an Essence and an
entrant into body; upon embodiment, it experiences a partition
unknown before it thus bestowed itself.
In whatsoever bodies it occupies- even the vastest of all, that in
which the entire universe is included- it gives itself to the whole
without abdicating its unity.
This unity of an Essence is not like that of body, which is a unit
by the mode of continuous extension, the mode of distinct parts each
occupying its own space. Nor is it such a unity as we have dealt
with in the case of quality.
The nature, at once divisible and indivisible, which we affirm to be
soul has not the unity of an extended thing: it does not consist of
separate sections; its divisibility lies in its presence at every
point of the recipient, but it is indivisible as dwelling entire in
the total and entire in any part.
To have penetrated this idea is to know the greatness of the soul
and its power, the divinity and wonder of its being, as a nature
transcending the sphere of Things.
Itself devoid of mass, it is present to all mass: it exists here and
yet is There, and this not in distinct phases but with unsundered
identity: thus it is "parted and not parted," or, better, it has
never known partition, never become a parted thing, but remains a
self-gathered integral, and is "parted among bodies" merely in the
sense that bodies, in virtue of their own sundered existence, cannot
receive it unless in some partitive mode; the partition, in other
words, is an occurrence in body not in soul.
[...]
There is, therefore, no escape: soul is, in the degree indicated,
one and many, parted and impartible. We cannot question the
possibility of a thing being at once a unity and multi-present,
since to deny this would be to abolish the principle which sustains
and administers the universe; there must be a Kind which encircles
and supports all and conducts all with wisdom, a principle which is
multiple since existence is multiple, and yet is one soul always
since a container must be a unity: by the multiple unity of its
nature, it will furnish life to the multiplicity of the series of an
all; by its impartible unity, it will conduct a total to wise ends.
[...]
Soul, therefore, is, in this definite sense, one and many; the
Ideal-Form resident in body is many and one; bodies themselves are
exclusively many; the Supreme is exclusively one.
_________________________________________________________________
The Tech Classics Archive
--
Nicholas <> am455@lafn.org <> Los Angeles
First of all, love truth for its own sake, for otherwise no recognition of
it will follow. HP Blavatsky
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application