Re: Returns of Christ
Dec 21, 1996 07:21 PM
by liesel
>To: theos-l@vnet.net
>From: liesel@dreamscape.com liesel f. deutsch
>Subject: Re: Returns of Christ
>I've been trying to put a message on theos-l sending SEASON'S GREETINGS TO
EVERYONE. Somehow my system gets locked & I can only send a reply to
another message. So here goes. ENJOY YOUR HOLIDAYS YOU-ALL.
Liesel
>>>Date: 20 199512 194722 -0500
>>>Errors-To: jem@vnet.net
>>>Reply-To: theos-l@vnet.net
>>>Originator: theos-l@vnet.net
>>>Sender: theos-l@vnet.net
>>>Precedence: none
>>>From: guru@nellie2.demon.co.uk Dr. A.M.Bain
>>>To: Multiple recipients of list <theos-l@vnet.net>
>>>Subject: Returns of Christ
>>>X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
>>>
>>>
>
>>>> If we define the Christ as an archetype
>>>> of the collective unconscious it seems fair to say that He/It
>>>> *has* returned *through* all the movements mentioned above.
>>>> Returned in many new forms and with conflicting messages.
>>>
>>>Jesus in the gospel accounts also gives conflicting messages!
>>>At one point he is quoted as saying he has come only to the lost
>>>sheep of the house of Israel and elsewhere accepts gentiles
>>>into his following.
>>>
>>>I guess God's son is just confused in whatever guise we find
>>>him. Should have had a daughter if you ask me which you
>>>probably don't.
>>>
>>>:- Alan
>>>--
>>>Member Theosophy International.
>>>Member Human Race.
>>>----------------------------------------
>>>Private e-mail: guru@nellie2.demon.co.uk
>>>
>>Alan thanks for the compliment but what makes you think a daughter would
>>be any less confused than a son? Confused in a different way perhaps but
>>confused nonetheless until Nirvana
>>
>>Liesel
>>
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application