Theos-Talk Archives (December 1995 Message tl00388)

>Date: 20 199512 194722 -0500
>Errors-To: jem@vnet.net
>Reply-To: theos-l@vnet.net
>Originator: theos-l@vnet.net
>Sender: theos-l@vnet.net
>Precedence: none
>From: guru@nellie2.demon.co.uk Dr. A.M.Bain
>To: Multiple recipients of list <theos-l@vnet.net>
>Subject: Returns of Christ
>X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
>
>
>> If we define the Christ as an archetype
>> of the collective unconscious it seems fair to say that He/It
>> *has* returned *through* all the movements mentioned above.
>> Returned in many new forms and with conflicting messages.
>
>Jesus in the gospel accounts also gives conflicting messages!
>At one point he is quoted as saying he has come only to the lost
>sheep of the house of Israel and elsewhere accepts gentiles
>into his following.
>
>I guess God's son is just confused in whatever guise we find
>him. Should have had a daughter if you ask me which you
>probably don't.
>
>:- Alan
>--
>Member Theosophy International.
>Member Human Race.
>----------------------------------------
>Private e-mail: guru@nellie2.demon.co.uk
>
Alan thanks for the compliment but what makes you think a daughter would
be any less confused than a son? Confused in a different way perhaps but
confused nonetheless until Nirvana

Liesel