Re: Response to Alan
Oct 22, 1999 05:22 PM
---- Original Message -----
> From: Gerald Schueler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Date: Friday, October 22, 1999 3:00 PM
> Subject: Response to Alan
> Alan, it is not a question of truth or falsehood>
> If you can find holes in the Buddhist karma=creator
> model, then please do so and I will listen.
I thought I had found at least one hole. As you presented it, it seemed
to me to be a circular argument depending more upon a given premise than
an empirically-based opinion or working hypothesis.
> My own
> model suggests that creativity itself is an inherent
> divine characterisitic of the Monad, because this
> is the only way that I can logically explain creation
> to myself. Once creation=manifestation begins,
> then karma takes over. It works for me, but
> probably only because every other model I have
> looked at has even worse flaws.
How does creation=manifestation *begin*? This is another "given" based
upon a model. Is not the only certainty simply that things happen?
> I have discovered that
> my own beliefs change as my view of truth changes
> and will likely continue to do so.
How do you conduct your research? Can you offer verifiable evidence to
support your model(s)?
I am genuinely curious, and not trying to score points or play mind
> Jerry S.
> You are currently subscribed to theos-l as: Alan@ambain.softnet.co.uk
> List URL - http://list.vnet.net/?enter=theos-l
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-theos-l-530Y@list.vnet.net
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application