Theos-Talk Archives (October 1999 Message tl00072)

In a message dated 10/5/99 3:05:05 AM Central Daylight Time,
hesse600@tem.nhl.nl writes:

> Ergo, a) The writers were not mahatmas, or b) mahatmas are not all they
>  > are cracked up to be, or c) they were written by someone else (singular
>  > or plural).
>  I think they were simply not all they were cracked up to
>  be (in fact they said so).

Again, I think people have too much of a high exalted view of the
mahatmas.  Even mahatmas are fallible.

Grigor