Theos-Talk Archives (August 1997 Message tl00409)

The inquiry I am making is just to find out if Gomes had found out any new
material. Everyone knows that he is a pro in researching historical matters
and has published. I have great respect for professionals in any field
because they have developed research techniques that rookie amateurs don't know.

I am just an amateur and interested in historical matters and as such
followed up to see if Gomes has any new information. All I am interested is
to find out historical information which can be backedup by documentation.
That's is all I am looking forward to.

>From what I have seen, none of the members or officers in the TS know much
about this matter and even if any of them know, I don't think any of them
are going to talk. 

I hope the above clarifies where I come from and why I followed up.

mkr

At 10:01 AM 8/19/97 -0400, you wrote:
>ramadoss@eden.com wrote:
>
>> Any further progress that Gomes had made?
>
>	This is the third time I have written this reply. I had gone into more
>detail, but the more detail I put in, the more trouble it will cause.
>The shortest version is: I have been going to various people in the TS
>whom I respect for information based on issues brought up in this list.
>Somebody has been distorting what I have written, and spreading it
>around, attributing things to these people that they have never said.
>
>	If someone misquotes me directly, I have my originals. If someone
>misquotes an authority whom I quote, they have to go to me to get my
>originals. I will no longer put anybody I like and respect in a position
>of having to defend themselves based on something that I am reported to
>have said. Period.
>
>	Bart Lidofsky
>