[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Aug 11, 1997 07:22 AM
by K. Paul Johnson
K. Paul Johnson wrote: > > It seems to me that the responses to Julia show the same kind > of variation among ARE members/students of the readings as is > found in Christians as a whole. With the Bible, there is a > large minority that believes it is literally true and > contains no errors. The majority finds it to contain truths > and falsehoods taken literally, but that there are symbolic > meanings in it that are "deeper truths." In the churches, this > makes for a split between "mainstream" and "fundamentalist" > denominations. > > By the same token, some of us see the Cayce readings as being > literally true and free from error in every detail, or lean > strongly in that direction. (You can't be a true blue > inerrantist literalist with the readings since Cayce himself > admitted errors and gave a wide range of reasons that some > readings were less reliable than others.) Others of us, myself > included, believe that not everything in the readings is > literally true but that there is symbolic meaning to be found > even where the literal content is not reliable. > > As we face 1998, I am quite skeptical of the expectations about > a literal return of Jesus, or catastrophic earth changes, or > Atlantean records being found. But for me the value of the > readings is not in their being literally correct about > everything, but in their usefulness as guidance on how to > live-- and by that measure no other body of teaching has been > as satisfying to my soul. > > One good thing about ARE is that it has managed to be a "big > tent" in which the more literalist and more skeptical coexist > without coming to blows (AFAIK). On this list we have > succeeded in presenting different points of view without > getting into heated arguments. After all, it won't be long > before one group will be in a position to say "I told you so," > and none of us really knows for sure which group that will be. > So it behooves us all to respect one another while disagreeing. Good Points by the way also ' found in Buddist etc. ' God Bless - Chris