Re: Doggie Doo Original Post
Aug 01, 1997 05:54 AM
by ramadoss
Keith had mentioned about who first posted the comment. Here is the full msg.
...............doss
>Return-Path: theos-l@vnet.net
>Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 08:49:27 -0400 (EDT)
>Originator: theos-l@vnet.net
>Sender: theos-l@vnet.net
>From: "A. Safron" <safron@concentric.net>
>Subject: Re: Rumpled sheets
>X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
>X-Comment: Theosophy Study List. (public)
>
>----------
>> From: Tom Robertson <mdmgyn@worldnet.att.net>
>> Subject: Re: Rumpled sheets
>> Date: Monday, July 28, 1997 8:57 PM
>>
>> >> >Bondage? Listen, there's so much energy between us, if we ever met, we
>> >> >probably spend three days in bed.
>> >>
>> >> RU M or F? I'm very picky, you know.
>> >
>> >It's your call, honey.
>>
>> Okay, I decided that URF.
>
>MURF? SMURF?
>>
>> >BTW, I KNOW that ts-l or nl-l or any other "l" controlled by those
>> >who think the world operates on the hushed tones of polite
>> >conversation would NEVER EVER let this slide down the
>> >Internet.
>>
>> This has been a very Theosophical discussion.
>
>In a decidedly Scorpion organization, that is true.
>
> It has included
>> unflinching humor in the face of a merciless attack,
>
>Attack? Did I aim for the groin?
>
>demonstrating
>> true brotherhood and forgiveness in action.
>
>Brotherhood? Are we talking about a gay relationship here?
>And who is forgiving what? Oh, yes, I cancelled the bondage date.
>
> I'm sure the moderator of
>> TS-L would let my comments slide, since she knows that I would never
>> say anything untheosophical, anyway.
>
>If the world contains all things theosophical and that includes sexual
banter, then
>that would be true. But my personal conversations with others at
>Olcott say that this mailing list is considered less than doggie doo.
>
>A. Safron
>
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application