Theos-Talk Archives (April 1997 Message tl00161)

Dr. A.M.Bain wrote:
> 
> In message <3357D414.4A03@sprynet.com>, Bart Lidofsky
> <bartl@sprynet.com> writes
> >       Now, certainly, theosophy allows for individual beliefs. But I would
> >also daresay that the overwhelming majority of theosophists would
> >consider any theory of reality that considers the ego precedent to be
> >inherently untheosophical.
> 
> Interesting, but perhaps a little incomplete?  I would be interested in
> your view (or definition) of "ego" before trying to follow this.  I use
> the Jungian approach which sees "ego" as a psychological complex within
> the personal unconscious.  And again, to suggest that something may be
> "un-theosophical" begs the question as to what is "theosophical".

	Ego as in lower self, kama manas and below.

	Bart Lidofsky