Theos-Talk Archives (February 1997 Message tl00030)

Lmhem111@aol.com wrote:
>
> Jerry, this is just a general response to your response before I move on. In
> using the examples I did, I didn't mean to imply that I support the dictum of
> "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth." This is the old Judaic law.

	Hmmmm...the law states that if someone loses an eye, then the person
who caused the injury should replace the eye as best as they can. The
same as a tooth, etc. What is wrong with that?

	Bart Lidofsky

------------------------------