Re: Limitations of Logic
Jan 22, 1997 11:42 PM
by Tom Robertson
Jerry Schueler wrote:
>There is almost no logic to magic (or magick) at all.
>Those who apply logic to it find that it won't work. Only by
>being illogical do we get results. Why? Possibly because logic
>and reason are human, and pertain to the human brain-mind. In order
>for magic to work, we must transcend or go beyond the human mind,
>and thus transcend logic. I can see from your discourse that you
>are terribly wrapped up in logic, seeing it as some kind of litmus
>test for Truth. Alas, I see this as self-limiting, because you
>will never get beyond the human condition that way. Truth is
>both logical and illogical. It must be so, since it is all-in-all.
There is a significant difference between what transcends logic and what is
illogical. That "we have nothing to fear but fear itself" is a paradoxical
truth that transcends logic. To conclude that X is an orange, from the
premises that all oranges are fruits and that X is a fruit, is illogical
and will be true only by chance. Truth and illogic do not mix, but there
is truth that transcends logic. If you understand what I mean by this
distinction, I would be surprised if you still said that successful magick
can be accomplished both by being illogical and by transcending logic.
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application