Re: Integrity of Krishnamurti
Nov 20, 1996 05:39 AM
by m.k. ramadoss
On Wed, 20 Nov 1996, Dr. A.M.Bain wrote:
> In message <199611192045.PAA17518@ultra1.dreamscape.com>, "liesel f.
> deutsch" <email@example.com> writes
> >>>Nasty mode on:
> >>> Was the convention before or after Jiddu started bopping his best
> >>>friend's wife?
> >>>Nasty mode off.
> >GOOD GOD, ANOTHER ONE!
> >For a spiritual group, methinks we have an inordinate amount of mud slingers.
> >How's that for raising people's consciousness?
> While I sympathise with Liesel's sentiment here, I feel that it is
> important to raise (again, I know) the question that the value we place
> upon the work of those who seek or have sought to lead or guide us can
> sometimes be affected by the extent to which they are seen to practice
> what they preach. I know nothing of this story, but clearly the
> implication is that JK may have slipped from his own standards at some
The issue relating to JK has been dealt head on in the recent
book by Mary Lutyens. I will be posting a partial review soon.
Keep tuned. It is going to be interesting to many.
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application