Theos-Talk Archives (November 1996 Message tl00080)

Dr. A.M.Bain writes:
>In message <Pine.BSD/.3.91.961102231238.12312A-100000@matrix.eden.com>,
>"m.k. ramadoss" <ramadoss@eden.com> writes
>>Alan:
>>
>>Geoffrey Baborka has spend a lot of time researching the issue and the
>>book was the result of his work. The conclusions reached therein are
>>satisfactory for me.
>>
>>If anyone has not seen this book, they may want to. If the conclusions
>>reached therein are not satisfactory so the reader/inquirer, then the
>>only other alternative is for himer (him/her) to investigate the
>>available materials and come to one's own conclusions.
>>
>>..MKRamadoss
>
>You didn't say whether his book is a TS published one.  I have, for
>example, his book, ~H.P. Blavatsky, Tibet and Tulku~.  This is a TPH
>Adyar publication.  I regard your reply as, regretfully, evasive.  I
>asked for your opinion of his conclusions, not his, and although you say
>they are satisfactory to you, I still don't know what they are, nor why
>you find them acceptable.  Can you not do a short summary for the
>benefit of myself and others on the list who may not be in a position to
>read his book, but who would, in any case, like to know what Doss's view
>is in Doss's words?
>
>Alan

What kind of position are you in that would prevent you from reading this
book, Bain?  Go to the library.

---
The Triaist