The 4 B's
Oct 26, 1996 10:55 AM
by Dr. A.M.Bain
In message <firstname.lastname@example.org>, RIhle@aol.com
>Why should modern women have to put up
>with this has-been? I don't know. Maybe because it can't be changed without
>turning THE THREE OBJECTS into THE THREE OBJECTS--REVISED.
They shouldn't have to put up with it - and why shouldn't the three
objects be the three revised objects? Other organisations move with the
times and still retain their integrity - enhance it even.
>Will the modern women see this one word and think that the Theosophical
>Society is just another male-dominated organization? Maybe some will, I
It's not a question of "maybe some will" but of "many already do." Your
post here seems to be reinforcing the idea of a male-dominated
> On the other hand, maybe some will stay long enough to look the
Heav smoker (now untheosophical) meat-eater (now untheosophical) user of
"colorful" language (extremely untheosophical).
Manipulator and manipulated, supporter of "new" doctrines, supporter of
CWL in connection with his self-admitted acts of child abuse. Believed
that a young Indian boy was the reincarnation of the Christ.
Seems saner than some - but a *naughty girl* for going it alone and
finding her own master! Very untheosophical behavior.
> Burnier etc. and conclude something
>quite different about the real Who's Who in the Society, past and present. .
Some thoughts on conclusions that might be reached above.
>Anyway, I call upon your sense of kinship, siblinghood, fellowship etc. not
>to hate me for standing alone, obdurate, and behind-the-times with this one
OK. But I think you are either confused or very very wrong. If I hated
you for your opinions, I would not like to know me.
THEOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL: Ancient Wisdom for a New Age:
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application