Theos-Talk Archives (July 1996 Message tl00604)

As part of a thread on biblical history with Jerry H-E, Abrantes wrote:

>Daniel Rops a catholic historian, at LEglise des apostres et des Martyrs,
>Paris,1948 chapter II, page 68 refers to E.Osty that published the epistles
>of Paul t 1943 and states: "the most part of scholars non-christians refuse
>to recognice I and II Timoty, Titus, Efesians, II Tessalonics, and Hebrews 
>the autorship of Saint Paul, even though ascribe some fragments of variable
>importance. There  is no doubt that really there is difference of style, 
>language and dogmatic concerns (clip). 

Moving away from Paul but still within "Gospels of ascribed variable
importance": 

What is the opinion of the readers of theos-l of the Gospel of St. Thomas?

Jim