Re: Core Teachings
Jul 16, 1996 07:41 AM
by Kim Poulsen
>I don't see the problem as core versus others. When I first got on to the
>list I too was guilty of crying BORING when Eldon and some others
>discussed hard things but after a bit I realised that there should be a
place >for everyone here without getting hassled for 'wrong thinking'. That
is why I >got into strife with Alexis because I think we should at least
respect each >other and each others views. Over time many views change and
what we >think today may not be what we think next year.
you may appreciate to know that this very concept of common "core
teachings" is something of a blow in the face to some of us. "The problem
of core versus others" is inherent in the idea itself - the idea is
positively dangerous. Its expounders seems to add various favorite writers
according to personal whim to this grouping but still fails to see the
self-contradictiory in this barrier-building work.
Every day the idea seems to be catching on, probably because it is not
refuted - except by the heroic last stand of Richard. Even KPJ seems to
have caught on to this idea of a core framework where authors can be inside
or outside according to the spiritual insight of the listmaker.
As a thought experiment along this line let us pronounce the SD the only
acceptable "core teaching" for true Theosophists. Then we will have as our
biblical main-source a work which try to synthesize the maximum amount of
other works. Can you see the irony in it? Or perhaps these thousands of
works would be "core works" as well? Then I would have to state my opinion
that the real essential works - the works containing the ideas translated
and adressed in the SD - remain largely unquoted. Before attempting to
demonstrate such an proposition I would probably have removed myself from
the very small core theosophistical enclosure, and there would be no need
for me to continue.
PS. Just to clarify, Bee, the core idea itself is far older in theosophy
than our discussions here - and in fact is common to all religions. Even
the original arhats themselves sat down themselves after the death of the
Buddha to renumerate essential ideas. Very interestingly they started with
something they called "the immutable"...
BTW, I do not think there is an "easy-to-read" short-cut to spiritual
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application