Theos-Talk Archives (July 1996 Message tl00146)

In message <9607050037.AA06334@toto.csustan.edu>, Jerry Hejka-Ekins
<jhe@toto.csustan.edu> writes
>So far Alex, Alan and Jerry S. have stated that no procedure or
>instruction at all would have been appropriate for CWL to use. 
>On the other side of the question, no one has so far come forward
>to defend CWL's actions.  Since the ES pledge requires its
>members to step forward and defend those who have been unjustly
>attacked, and remain quiet when the statements are true, I must
>come to the conclusion that either our ES audience concedes to
>the truth of the documentation recently presented here, or they
>have decided to break their pledge.  
> 
>JHE
> 
And one is also bound to ask the question, "If it was okay for CWL to
teach this as valid esoteric/occult teaching to young boys (or anyone
else) and noone has, SFAIK, issued any statement to the contrary, is
this still accepted and official E.S. teaching approved by the masters?"

Alan
---------
THEOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL:
Ancient Wisdom for a New Age
TI@nellie2.demon.co.uk
http://www.garlic.com/~rdon/TI.html