Theos-Talk Archives (March 1995 Message tl00245)

Paul G: <I feel it _is_ valuable to debate who they were, but
more importantly, _what_ they are, and the implications this has
for us today.  The masters themselves suggest that they should
not be considered as personalities, but rather as the Principle
behind.>

I don't disagree with you Paul.  I agree that such a debate is
important.  I simply suggested that history buffs who want to
argue about WHO the Masters were can do so in Theos-Roots, which
John thoughtfully set aside for such things.

As far as WHAT the Masters are, we have been discussing this on
Theos-L for some time, as is proper.

          Jerry S.