Theos-Talk Archives (December 1999 Message tl00293)

> No. I am saying that the group wouldn't even discuss a compromise. ACT
> had a platform that contained a few good ideas, but the good ideas were
> couched in language that almost guaranteed that they would not get
> adopted (and if you choose to go over them in detail, I will not
> respond. I have responded to them in detail in the past, and don't
> choose to waste my time over moot issues).

You were the one that brought this entire thing back to the surface in the
first place. I didn't think discussions about this would ever happen again.
And the most significant points to this day haven't been answered. They are
carefully avoided. -JRC