[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Nov 22, 1999 03:58 AM
by WLR7D
>You are the one who claimed there was a 2% genetic difference between humans. I simply said if this were so, then there is less difference between humans and chimps. For example, 139 of the 141 amino acids of the alpha chain of hemoglobin in the gorilla are identical to those in humans. There is no difference in this regard between humans and chimps at all. Of course you will quibble with the use of the words: claimed, between, identical, difference, less, those, etc. Do you even care what the point is I was originally trying to make or is this just a game? >If you are arguing that there are no physical, social or psychological differences between the races, I don't know what further I could say. How do you argue with someone who denies black is black, or white is white? After all, color is just an illusion. Well wait, that's not entirely right since white is not really a color. Or is it? Gosh, let's debate this for a couple of years. Surely that will get us closer to understanding the theosophical truths of the universe. >I have imposed no "proof" criteria on anyone. I simply would like to know what is asserted and the basis for the assertion. This isn't a court of law. I'm not here to hold anyone liable for damages. It appears your interest is primarily winning a war with words. If it will make you feel better, I'll withdraw and you can claim victory. I'm not really interested in such picayune balttles. Randy