[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Jul 11, 1999 06:02 AM
by Virginia Grenier
> Mr. Ramadoss wrote: > As for those in the US, I found the following to be important if one is > ever challenged of copyright infringement. > > " By contrast the operative concept in the United States > is 'fair use' which, in the simplest terms, means: Nonprofit use is > fair use." > A good location to read more about this is http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. The notes section is interesting. Regarding fair use, the law reads: --- Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include - (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors. --- -Mike Grenier vlg@minn.net