Theos-Talk Archives (September 1997 Message tl00012)

Bart Lidofsky wrote:
> 
> Vincent Beall wrote:
> > If the problem concerns metamathematics which is really very modern, one
> > would consider the null set, however, ancient metaphysics would 'not'
> > presume the null set as it would actually be a consideration of a fouth
> > element. Where one was considering the Hindu G-dhead for instance, the
> > practical aspect of trinity would be lost; the null set would not
> > represent any expression of the G-dhead, where subject of consideration
> > is G-d.
> 
>         Either it's mathematics or it's not. It can't be mathematics, but only
> as it suits oneself; that way leads to the assumption that ego is
> supreme.
> 
>         Bart Lidofsky

Maybe it's just statisical combinations and not set theory.

Think that through.

Vincent
-- 

vincent@dmv.com

http://home.dmv.com/~vincent/