Theos-Talk Archives (January 1997 Message tl00357)

kymsmith@micron.net writes:
>Richard wrote:
>I think, though, Richard, there is only one Kym.  There is a Kim (spelled
>with an 'i'), but there is only one Kym, as far as I know.  Surely you're
>not doing the unthinkable - grouping all women into one and calling them
>Kyms, are you?  You may not be seeing us as individuals.  Say it isn't so,
>Richard!
>
>HOWEVER!  It warms my oh-so-hardened heart to know that you have been alert
>to any gender jumblings.  I surely do hope a few other fellas will follow
>your lead.
>  
>
>>Tell me how I should be thinking about these things and I will undoubtedly
>>cooperate (I've been married). . . .
>
>I look forward to your cooperation.  
>
>I look forward to your future postings.
>
>I look forward to assimilating you.
>
>Resistance is futile.
>
>Kym 
>
>
Ok.  I admit it.  The last two statements were my personal additions.  Kym 
should not be held responsible for those two statements.  I thought it was 
funny.  
---
The Triaist(whistling and staring at the sky)