[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Jul 08, 1996 04:57 PM
by Jim Meier
Hi Chuck -- A couple of days ago you wrote, >I have a real problem with things that get practiced for thousands of years. > They tend to get just a bit ossified. No kidding. :) But its the FORM that can become inadequate, not the original impulse. The trick (I think) is to recognize what is/was valid separate from all the would-be commentators in the world. To some extent, I think we can see this in the tendency of some modern theosophy students to discount everything after 1890, more or less, in an attempt to skip over some of the many sidetracks... Who can count the various schools of Buddhism? One can spend a lifetime making a scholastic study of them, and that's no doubt useful, but all of the "thousands of years of commentary and ossification" doesn't really detract from the message of the Buddha. Does it? And IMO, reading the Sermon on the Mount gives all one really needs to know about Christianity... and all of the nonsense of the last 2,000 years doesn't mean squat, really. In the case of Raja Yoga, since it's based anyway upon personal experience of the integration of the personality with the Soul, the only real question is whether or not the text of Patanjali as we have it is an accurate rendition (or so it seems to me). [clip] >In any event, it may be that I have lived long enough to have heard too many >scare stories about everything from mastrubation to cholesterol and I am the >sort of person who just naturally rejects warnings out of hand. I am a risk >taker. And I have found that a damned good way to live. Sure something can >go wrong and I might get killed, but what the hell, I'll be back and that >cavalier attitude towards life carries over into my spiritual practice as >well. It gives me the freedom to pursue things that make angels nervous and >the older I get the more I am convinced that the pursuit is perhaps more >important than the goal. >I don't know if any of this rambling answers your questions, but it was a >try. >Chuck the Heretic I can't think of the guy's name, but reading your post reminded me of a famous businessman who returned to give the commencement speech at his alma mater and shocked the establishment by telling the graduating students, "There are those who will tell you not to burn your candle at both ends. I say, HELL! Break it in the middle and burn it four ways!" Which has always seemed a good idea to me. Anything beats being merely a bookworm, and some pretty heavy hitters have spoken about taking the Kingdom of Heaven by force... but meditation seems to be the key to effecting change. Jim