Theos-Talk Archives (April 1996 Message tl01179)

At 01:10 PM 4/26/96 -0400, you wrote:
>Whatever was wrong, wherever it was, has been fixed, so I have
>printed out Rich's comments in order to reply to them.
>
>Dear Rich,
>
>I asked for a one-page summary of Blavatskian anthropology,
>stating where and how you thought it would be confirmed by
>future science.  Your response has no such summary, just a list
>of challenges to current anthropology in general.
>No mention of HPB is in there at all, so it will hardly do for
>the purpose at hand.  Thanks for trying, but as I'm
>unsubscribing today I won't be available to be go-between for
>the proposed dialogue.
>
Paul:

This is Rich's apparent methodology, the "Pit Bull Approach"! It's very
juvenile, and no matter what one says to him his response is "Nyah, nyah,
you're another". He is all the things you say he is, but primarily his main
focus is fanaticism. He has a typically ULT view of the subject and anyone
or anything who disagrees with him in any way, he attacks. He's a typically
"Generation X" type in that he views hostility and disrespect as apparently
"cool", and is apparently proud that the definition of Gentleman is a
mystery to him. I have added his address to my filter and so I won't be
bothered by his existence any longer. If you are in fact, "un subscribing to
Theos-L, I'm sorry, but do keep in touch. As things stand now, we're moving
to the country on or around June 5th. We've found a lovely house in
Geurneville on the Russian River and it will be nice to get out of the
Castro. (Too many overlapping problematical auras, and too much drugs and
booze..makes an empath "itchy")

alexis