Theos-Talk Archives (April 1996 Message tl00531)

Liesel:

At 18:15 1996/04/12 -0500, you wrote:
>Bob,
>
>I think TI is also a thing with which each one is able to fulfill their own
>dharma, whatever that dharma may be, ie do your own theosophical thing, with
>the support of others.

With which I completely agree.  Why not then let the description of the TI
and its version of the three objects simply proclaim that point and cease
the discussions of Wagner and Nazi Germany?  Perhaps they belong in the
Theosophy-History list, but surely not here.  I raised the point because,
with my very limited time for e-mail, I found the number of (to me)
irrelevant or pointless posts getting pretty high.

In my view, discussions should be reasonably relevant and lead to a
decision.  Then the thread should end, not proliferate into hundreds of side
issues.

Do you think, as I do, that this list needs a moderator to bring discussions
to a head and perhaps call for a vote on decisions?

BTW, are you the Liesel Deutsch who knows Stan Treloar, the former General
Secretary of the TSinC?  He's quite a character, and I wish he were on here.
He'd cut through the chaff and bring discussions to a head pretty quick!
(If one can stand his puns!)  To practise what I preach, this last comment
should be responded to directly to me at        rholmstrom@voyageur.ca

Take care,

==<<Bob Holmstrom>>==  <rholmstrom@voyageur.ca>