Theos-Talk Archives (April 1996 Message tl00040)

Mysteries is ok with me.

LFD
......................................................................

>In message <960408015500_72662.1335_IHD138-2@CompuServe.COM>, Don
>DeGracia <72662.1335@compuserve.com> writes
>>Perhaps TI would
>>be setting off on a better foot if it recognizes at the onset how important it
>>is to leave the door open for honest intelellectual assesment and
criticism.  In
>>this regard, seeking *verifiable* consistencies and regularities in
Humanity and
>>Nature may be the most meaningful broad statement that could be put forth in
>>this regard.
>>
>>Thanks for considering these ideas.
>>
>>Don DeGracia, PhD
>
>I have been thinking about "Mysteries in Nature" (hoping no one will
>want to start an in depth discussion about the meaning of "Nature" - if
>we spend too much time on definitions, we will a) miss the point of TI,
>and b) not get much done.
>
>As I see it, any individual or group of individuals within (or without)
>TI can do as TI has done, and add to his/her/its point of view "which
>I/we interpret as follows ..."
>
>Respectfully,
>
>Alan
>---------
>THEOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL:
>Ancient Wisdom for a New Age
>TI@nellie2.demon.co.uk
>
>