Theos-Talk Archives (April 1996 Message tl00018)

I like "Free" too. As for defining what it means, one could do one's PhD
thesis on that. Let it mean whatever it means to individual members, as long
as it's some sensible kind of free... like free love isn't our style, &
being free of one's body none of us are yet; what it means in terms of
actions &ethics is debatable, I would say free within Ahimsa.

Liesel
..............................................................................

>In message <v01530504ad8ce72f29a7@[165.227.35.194]>, Rodolfo Don
><rdon@garlic.com> writes
>>*I think that it could be included in the first paragraph, but I really
>>would like to define FREE. Maybe we could all get involved in trying to
>>define 'FREE' by explaining what it means to us as theosophists.*
>>
>>THEOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL is comprised of FREE men and women who subscribe to
>>the Three Objects of the TS, but in a more up to-date-form based on
>>suggestions by members of the internet community, and expressed thus:
>
>I like it, I like it!  Unless anyone objects - though I can't see why -
>I will add this to the next public (May) statement.
>
>Alan
>---------
>THEOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL:
>Ancient Wisdom for a New Age
>TI@nellie2.demon.co.uk
>
>