[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Feb 07, 1996 12:06 PM
by Fredrik Montelius
Reply to Rich Taylor, ULT San Fransisco from Fredrik Montelius, Sweden. Thank you for your comment on my e-letter. You certainly have a point in what you are saying, Mr. Taylor. I will think about what you wrote.. F. Montelius >Fred from ULT Sweden wrote, > >> Almost any Good American would stand up for the rights of the First >Amendment Right to >> Freedom of Speech. This is very understandable. Far too many can testify >to >> the pains of restrictions on this freedom, forced by a state upon the >> individual man. But among all cries for The Individual Rights, often the >> aspect of Individual Responsibility is forgotten. Did not HPB rage against >> the media and did she not just hate all the "mental pollution" (my >> expression) distributed by newspapers (and I am more than certain she would > >> include any other media operating today) saying that journalists were >> responsible for spreading mental diseases by writing articles in an >> unresponsible manner, and did she not say that the Masters had said there >> would some day in an unspecified future be neccesary to appoint an entirely > >> new police force, a "thought police" unit, to defend people against >> destructive thinking? > >Boy this is a challenging post, and from a fellow ULT associate to boot! > >I am honestly confused by contradicting moral imperatives. > >(1) The Masters teach, and I firmly believe, that to interfere with an >individual's free will is black magic and produces awful results every time >for all concerned. > >(2) The Masters also teach us to defend people from unjust attacks, to >repudiate hypocrisy, to lead clean, pure, giving, honest, compassionate >lives. > >How are we to lead pure lives defending people from harm and injustice, and >yet allow maximum liberty and freedom for each incarnate Monad to grow and >experience and learn as it sees fit? What to do when these vehicles of body >and prana and lower mind just don't behave the way we want them to? > >This is a central legal dilemma in America and in any free nation (Sweden is >among the freest and most permissive, from what I know). But beyond the >merely legal dilemma, what is the moral imperative here? > >Thank you, Fred, for making me and all of us stop and think about these >important issues. > >Rich Taylor, U.L.T. San Francisco >