Theos-Talk Archives (December 1995 Message tl00468)

resent -- possible delivery errors -- jem

reply to JRC from jem

>>jem >> I recently received an e-mail from Dr. Algeo which suggests that
>>the intent of the changes were to directly conform with requests
>>from the Adyar/Committee.

>JRC >Is there some particular reason why this explanation was not
>sent to the general list? Especially since so many have been
>asking for precisely this kind of explanation?

Hi -

he replied to me since I sent it directly to him. My original
concern was if the published by-law changes were correct when they mentioned
that the changes were in response to Adyar's requests. The letter he sent me
just confirmed that TSA was responding to input from Adyar. No real new info.

he gave no details or specific references/copies of any letters etc..
I hope he puts something together so we can see the wording of the Adyar-
requests.

peace -

john mead

p.s.
> I don't think Wheaton needs another option they have two:
>1 Simply declare the current vote null and void due to the
>irregularities present in the process as noted in the letter
>from Lodge Presidents or
>2 By a vote of the Board withdraw the current revisions.

I do not have any problems with these. I'm glad you're promoting
the ideas. :-