[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Dec 10, 1996 03:00 PM
by eldon
Alan: > [writing to Ann]: >Of course God does not and cannot have a sexual identity yet >the language which supposes this persists and those like >myself who protest are either ignored or insulted though not >insulted on theos-l. According to our theosophical textbooks the separation into sexes happened in an earlier race and will one day in the distant future end. It is a temporary experience. We as human Monads are not male or female but simply human. The being whose existence brings about our world a being which might be called "God" is sexless. Sexual differences are like other patterns of personality; they are psycho-physical. They are among those specific attributes taken on in a particular lifetime. We will never directly know the "God" whose life energies create our world. That being bears a relationship to us akin to the relationship that we bear to our lifeatoms or Skandhas. What we relate to and know are gods and goddesses. These are the Dhyani-Chohans the highest beings in our system. They establish the laws of nature and spiritual superstructure of the world. While male and female are polarizations of our physical body and temporary constructs masculine and feminine are universal qualities that things can take on. We can have a male or female deity. They are male or female not because of physical form but because of representing a masculine or feminine quality. Shiva for instance would be male and Shakti female. What we will find in the future I think is that as physical gender differences disappear that anyone can live out an individually-appropriate mix of masculine and feminine qualities without regard to the size of their nose the color of their eyes nor their reproductive plumbing. -- Eldon